Chapter And Authors Information
INTRODUCTION: UTILIZING OER WITH BLENDED APPROACHES FOR ENABLING HIGHER EDUCATION IN REFUGEE CONTEXTS
OER IN THE INFORMATION AGE
MOOCS – AN OER PHENOMENON IN BLENDED LEARNING MODELS
TIME, FIDELITY, SPACE AND HUMANNESS OF BLENDED LEARNING MODELS
BLENDED LEARNING IN REFUGEE CONTEXTS
INZONE’S COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ECOSYSTEM FOR ENABLING HIGHER EDUCATION IN REFUGEE CONTEXTS
InZone’s collaborative learning ecosystem model for enabling higher education in refugee contexts has been developed specifically to address various obstacles faced by learners in low resource and challenging contexts and to provide scaffolding support which enables blended learning in these contexts. The learning ecosystem uses, Collaborative Learning theory as a framework from which a learning ecosystem can utilise various support mechanisms to enable learning. The theory, at its most basic level, can be said to describe and govern a situation where two or more people learn together, or attempt to learn together (Dillenbourg, 1999). It is borne out of the Vygotskian perspective which sees learning as essentially a sociocultural process that understands cognitive development as requiring interaction between two or more people (Lantolf and Pavlenko 1995; Lantolf and Thorne 2006). Learning from this theoretical perspective is not just a matter of peers interacting and learning from each other, but can also require individuals interacting with mentors and more knowledgeable peers who enable learning through a process of guidance and/or collaboration (Lin, 2015). The InZone collaborative learning ecosystem embraces this perspective by placing the learner at the centre of an ecosystem where he or she interacts with his or her peers, as well as interacting with other the actors in the learning ecosystem who facilitate and collaborate in the learning process. Through a decade long experience of working with learners and other education actors in low resource and fragile contexts, InZone has accumulated extensive knowledge into the obstacles and barriers faced by learners and the context in which its programmes operate in. From this informed perspective, the InZone collaborative learning ecosystem model has been developed to incorporate 5 key actors who collaborate in a flexible and adaptive manner to enable higher education courses in the locations in which it operates in – students, lecturer, course coordinator, onsite facilitator, and online tutor. The key actors collaborate together in the ecosystem to enable tailored higher education undergraduate blended learning. InZone enables these courses in Azraq refugee camp in Jordan and Kakuma refugee camps in Kenya. The following diagram illustrates collaboration among the actors in the InZone collaborative learning ecosystem. This diagram is followed by a brief outline of the key actors and their roles.
KEY ACTOR ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
FLEXIBILITY AND ADAPTABILITY AT THE HEART OF INZONE’S COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ECOSYSTEM
DATA – THE FLEXIBILITY AND ADAPTABILITY OF INZONE’S LEARNING ECOSYSTEM AS SCAFFOLDING IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS
|Course Name||One Health||Basic Engineering||Basic Engineering||Global Poverty||Global History||Human Rights||Basic Medical Training Kakuma||Human Rights||One Health|
|Course Length||12 weeks||14 weeks||14 weeks||12 weeks||12 weeks||12 Week||12||15||12|
|No. of Students Enrolled||15||15||15||9||6||20||13||20||5|
|No. of Male Students Enrolled||9||13||13||6||4||18||11||12||4|
|No. of Female Students Enrolled||6||2||2||3||2||2||4||3||1|
|No. of Online Tutors||3||2||2||2||2||1||2||2||5|
|No. of Students Passed Exam||14||15||15||9||4||12||9||15||4|
|Course Completion Rate||93%||100%||100%||100%||66%||60%||69%||75%||80%|
Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in Online Courses: Exploring Issues and Solutions—A Literature Review. SAGE Open.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777
Bonk, C., and Graham, C.R. (2012). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. John Wiley & Sons
Carron, D., (2019). The Study and Teaching of Human Rights in Refugee Camps: Learning From Experience. https://www.europenowjournal.org/2019/03/04/the-study-and-teaching-of-human-rights-in-refugee-camps-learning-from-experience/
Deimann, M., and Farrow, R. (2013). Rethinking OER and their Use: open Educaiton as Bildung. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Vol.14, No. 3 (2013).
Atkins, et al., (2007) in Geser, G., (2007). Open educaitonal practices and resources: OLCOS Roadmap 2012. Salzburg: Salzburg Research
Anders, A., (2015). Theories and Applications oif Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs). The Case for Hybrid Design. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Volume 16, Number 6.
Bralic, A., and Divak, B. (2018). Integrating MOOCs in Traditionally taught Courses: achieving learning outcomes with blended learning. International Journal of Educational technology in higher Education (2018) 15:2
Connected learning in Crisis Consortium (CLCC) (2017). Quality GuidelinesPplaybook: Lessons Learned Through Contextualized Practice. Avaliable online: http://www.connectedlearning4refugees.org/wpcontent/uploads/CLC_playbook_screen.pdfAccessed on: 20 11 2018
Dillenbourg P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: Dillenbourg P (ed) Collaborative-learning: cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–19
European Association of Distance Learning (EADTU), (2012). Quality Assessment for E-Learning: a Benchmarking Approach, 2ndEdition. European and Cultural DG: Lifelong Learning programme.
Edewor, P. et al, (2014). ICTs and Sustainable Development of Higher Education in Nigeria: Rewriting the Ugly Narrative. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER. Vol 4. Number 1.
Garner, B., & Oke, L. (2014) Blended learning: Theoretical foundations. Marion, IN: Indiana Wesleyan University. Retrieved 12 May 2015 from http://www.indwes.edu/CLI/The-Learning-Academy/Blended-Lea rning-Theoretical-Foundation.
Halkic, B. and Arnold, P. (2019). Refugees and online education: student perspectives on need and support in the context of (online) higher education. Learning, Media and Technology Volume 44, 2019 – Issue 3: Global Technologies, Local Practices. PP 345-364
Holetescu, C., Grosseck, G., Cretu, V. and Naaji, A. (2014). Integrating MOOCs in Blednded Learning Conference: The 10th eLearning and Software for Education Conference – eLSE 2014
Hovis, S. (2012). Developing capable leaders through blended learning. T+D, 66(5), 76-77. Inter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE), (2010a). The multiple faces of education in conflict-affected and fragile contexts. Avaliable online : http://s3.amazonaws.com/ineeassets/resources/INEE_Multiple_faces_of_ed_in_conflict-affected__fragile_contexts_FINAL.pdf .
Lantolf J.P. Pavlenko A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annu Rev Appl Linguist 15:108–124
Lantolf J.P. and Thorne S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lin, L. (2015). Investigating Chinese HE EFL Classrooms: Using Collbaorative Learning to Enhance Learning. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Madianou, M. (2019). Technocolonialism: Digital Innovation and Data Practices in the Humanitarian Response to Refugee Crises. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863146
Majee, U. & Ress, S.B., (2020) Colonial legacies in internationalisation of higher education: racial justice and geopolitical redress in South Africa and Brazil, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50:4, 463-481 DOI:10.1080/03057925.2018.1521264.
Martin, F.G. (2012). Will Massive Open Online Courses Change How We Teach? Communications of the ACM, 55, 8, 26 -28.
Mook-Maker (2016) MOOC-Maker Construction of Management Capacities of MOOCs in Higher Education. http://www.mooc-maker.org/wp content/files/WPD1.6_INGLES.pdf
Moser-Mercer B., Hayba E., Goldsmith J. (2018) Higher Education Spaces and Protracted Displacement: How Learner-Centered Pedagogies and Human-Centered Design Can Unleash Refugee Innovation. In: Hostettler S., Najih Besson S., Bolay JC. (eds) Technologies for Development. UNESCO 2016. Springer, Cham
O’Keeffe, P. and Akkari, A. (2020). University Education for Refugees Must Meet Refugees’ Needs. The Conversation, May 2020. https://theconversation.com/university-education-in-refugee-camps-mustmeet-refugee-needs-137796
Papano, L. (2012, November 2). The year of the MOOC. The New York times Retrived from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
Inter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies (INEE), (2010b). Minimum Standards for Education: Preparedness, Response, Recovery. Avaliable Online: https://toolkit.ineesite.org/resources/ineecms/uploads/1313/INEE_2010_Minimum_standards_for_education.pdf
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Naidu, S. (2016). Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in distance education. Distance Education, 37(3), 245–269.
UNDP, (2018). The Sustainable Development Goals. Avaliable Online: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
UNESCO, (2017). Six ways to ensure higher education leaves no one behind. Policy Paper 30. Online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002478/247862E.pdf
UNESCO, (2018).Education for Sustainable Development. https://en.unesco.org/partnerships/partnering/education-sustainable-development
Strauss, R. (2008). The blended learning approach. Chief Learning Officer, 7(8), 50-53. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2010, July 25). Professor’s use of technology in teaching. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Professors-Use-of/123682/
Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0.The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,12(3), 39–59. Retrieved fromhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/883/1729
Williams, R., Mackness, J., & Gumtau, S. (2012). Footprints of emergence.The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,13(4), 49–90. Retrieved fromhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1267/2308